Jump to content


Photo

Engagement Ring


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Vër§íðñ 1.0

Vër§íðñ 1.0
  • Members
  • 391 posts

Posted 28 August 2004 - 06:45 PM

Library info for Engagement Ring:
Armor base: 0, Can be worn by: clerics, druids, fighters, mages, paladins, rangers, thieves, berserkers, pacifists, Description: The Engagement Ring is a band of valuable pure gold, worn by couples who are planning to get married. Also used to ask for marriage., Level needed to equip it: 1, Strength modifier: 0, Intelligence modifier: 0, Dexterity modifier: 0, Constitution modifier: 0, Wisdom modifier: 0, Charisma modifier: 0.


Descr isn't that good, but the idea is.

What ya think?

Also not sure if right forum

Buy in same place you buy wedding ring, cost same as wedding ring also.

Edited by Vër§íðñ 1.0, 28 August 2004 - 06:46 PM.

I only log on to check memos, and rare chat. See you all on the other side.

#2 Squee

Squee

    Sorcerer

  • Members
  • 1810 posts

Posted 28 August 2004 - 06:49 PM

What's the point? Numerous Nightmist players have made a mockery of marriage anyways.
Posted Image

#3 Silver_Dragoness

Silver_Dragoness
  • Members
  • 228 posts

Posted 28 August 2004 - 07:21 PM

I have to agree. Engagement ring. they already have enough useless items. why make new ones? Besides. Lover's Lockets can be used as an engagement ring thingy... but thats my opinion.

"suddenly i heard a tapping, as of someone gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door"

 

Naamah - Main

Tyrelline - 1A


#4 Deathwish

Deathwish
  • Members
  • 301 posts

Posted 28 August 2004 - 07:23 PM

Go play The Sims if you want a more complex marriage system
Out, out brief candle. Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player who struts and frets his hour on the stage and then is heard no more.

#5 Silver_Dragoness

Silver_Dragoness
  • Members
  • 228 posts

Posted 28 August 2004 - 07:26 PM

Go play The Sims if you want a more complex marriage system

Lmaoooooooo omg that is very tru lol But theres no cool weapons on the sims... unless you count potions that help you steal other ppls spouses weapon then ya sure

"suddenly i heard a tapping, as of someone gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door"

 

Naamah - Main

Tyrelline - 1A


#6 Sneaky

Sneaky
  • Members
  • 2372 posts

Posted 28 August 2004 - 11:53 PM

I prefer the slapping system in the sims over Nightmist's pair of hands, thats about it.

Edit- oh yea, supported. Hey sexy laaadies...

Edited by Sneaky, 28 August 2004 - 11:55 PM.

Chuck Norris wears Jack Bauer pajamas.

deimos the noob said no


#7 Ryuku

Ryuku

    Ryuku Ingame, Best 3v3er ever

  • Members
  • 2003 posts

Posted 29 August 2004 - 06:24 AM

Mike, this idea sucks, only because marrige on NightMist is stupid, get a boyfriend/girlfriend irl, and if your just to damn ugly, you don't deserve love >:P

#8 Vër§íðñ 1.0

Vër§íðñ 1.0
  • Members
  • 391 posts

Posted 29 August 2004 - 04:39 PM

Name's Ronnie, and no i'm not to ugly
I only log on to check memos, and rare chat. See you all on the other side.

#9 Sneaky

Sneaky
  • Members
  • 2372 posts

Posted 29 August 2004 - 07:56 PM

I'm Mike, i think he was talkin in regards to my post? :P
Chuck Norris wears Jack Bauer pajamas.

deimos the noob said no


#10 Julius

Julius
  • Members
  • 643 posts

Posted 30 August 2004 - 12:53 AM

The only problem with this idea, is that an 'engagement ring' and a 'wedding ring' would occupy two ring slots and sacrificing potentialy high AC.

An engagement ring could be whatever you want it to, When i asked my in game wife to marry me I gave her a Crystal Ring as her engagement ring.

But I would not have any objection to the ring being added.
Julius/Juls main
Julius 1 alt

#11 Thunderja

Thunderja

    Desperate Housewives #1

  • Members
  • 1782 posts

Posted 30 August 2004 - 04:53 AM

Mike, this idea sucks, only because marrige on NightMist is stupid, get a boyfriend/girlfriend irl, and if your just to damn ugly, you don't deserve love >:P

/csl
I wouldn't mind stabbing you in the face, if that's cool with you?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users