Jump to content


Photo

Projections For 2008


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

Poll: Who's gonna win the 2008 election?

Who's gonna win the 2008 election?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Go Away

Go Away
  • Members
  • 23 posts

Posted 11 January 2005 - 06:24 PM

Just curious, who has the best chance?
Bye.

#2 Prophet

Prophet
  • Members
  • 1772 posts

Posted 11 January 2005 - 07:04 PM

Arnie has 0% unless law is changed to allow foreigners to become president.
Si Senior!

#3 Lady_Maha

Lady_Maha
  • Members
  • 479 posts

Posted 11 January 2005 - 09:05 PM

Arnie has 0% unless law is changed to allow foreigners to become president.

The correct term is naturalized citizens, but you are correct, Arnie can't become president because he wasn't US citizen from birth.

My guess would be Bush/Cheney manage to push through a change to the ammendments, allowing presidents to run unlimited terms again. As for winning, I am sure his little helpers will figure out how to come up with all the needed votes again.

Yes, I'm a pessimist.
Social Engineering Specialist - Because there is no patch for human stupidity

#4 Consumed

Consumed

    o0o-Alias ig

  • Members
  • 900 posts

Posted 11 January 2005 - 09:25 PM

if there was a change in amendment i think bill clinton would win... but doubt will happen so i think hillary clinton and john edwards win...
-Alias ingame-

#5 Vodka

Vodka
  • Members
  • 553 posts

Posted 11 January 2005 - 10:26 PM

I've talked to a few that would like to see Hillary in office. It'd be nice to see a female run for a change.. although, I doubt it'll happen.

Just because I'm Anti-Bush ... he'll try and pass the limitation law of how long you can be/serve as president and run again.. while you Bush lovers put him back in office. :unsure:
When you do something right nobody remembers, but when you do something wrong nobody forgets.

Hump in game.

#6 Momba

Momba
  • Members
  • 670 posts

Posted 11 January 2005 - 11:51 PM

Clinton is going to be back in office. This time Hillary tho :unsure:

Would love to see Hillary Clinton/Collin Powell.

Edited by Momba, 11 January 2005 - 11:51 PM.

My inner child is a mean little f*ucker

#7 Sneaky

Sneaky
  • Members
  • 2372 posts

Posted 12 January 2005 - 12:00 AM

Eugene V. Debbs/Al Sharpton...

Serious answer:

Hilary Clinton will be Democratic nominee, and if Republican's play it smart and nominate a woman as well (because honestly, no Republican male has a great chance of beating Hillary..), Condoleeza Rice would be a smart selection.
Chuck Norris wears Jack Bauer pajamas.

deimos the noob said no


#8 Penguin

Penguin

    cummins powaaah

  • Members
  • 982 posts

Posted 12 January 2005 - 12:03 AM

to bad they don't have any truely conservative canadites that would have a slight chance of winning

/t momba seeing how those two have litte in common policy wise, it seems you don't care who is most qualified for the position, but that you just want a woman/minority in office

#9 Momba

Momba
  • Members
  • 670 posts

Posted 12 January 2005 - 01:16 AM

to bad they don't have any truely conservative canadites that would have a slight chance of winning

/t momba seeing how those two have litte in common policy wise, it seems you don't care who is most qualified for the position, but that you just want a woman/minority in office

Or it would seem to some that I would like a form of leadership that is more diversified. It would be nice to see a President and Vice President who's view aren't generally the same. But thier common interest would be to better America.

American politics are imo a joke. We vote based on who can promise us the most while campaigning and spend thier whole term in office battling them to be true to thier word.
My inner child is a mean little f*ucker

#10 Penguin

Penguin

    cummins powaaah

  • Members
  • 982 posts

Posted 12 January 2005 - 01:21 AM

Sad, isn't it?

#11 Go Away

Go Away
  • Members
  • 23 posts

Posted 13 January 2005 - 02:13 AM

But jokes are usually funny, which American politics ain't.
Bye.

#12 Penguin

Penguin

    cummins powaaah

  • Members
  • 982 posts

Posted 13 January 2005 - 02:16 AM

huh?

#13 Go Away

Go Away
  • Members
  • 23 posts

Posted 13 January 2005 - 03:12 AM

American politics are imo a joke.

Was referring to that. ^^^
Bye.

#14 Kalinya

Kalinya
  • Members
  • 10 posts

Posted 19 January 2005 - 03:10 AM

Im gonna go with Hillary Clinton/John Edwards and Maybe Rudy Guilliani (sp) and Colin Powell :unsure:

#15 Stotic

Stotic
  • Members
  • 530 posts

Posted 20 January 2005 - 01:31 AM

to bad they don't have any truely conservative canadites that would have a slight chance of winning

Guilliani, Pataki

I would hate to have Hilary as my President. The Clintons just want to get more power in their party. It'd be a wise choice for the democratic nominee to at least choose Hilary as a running mate.
We'll douse ourselves in gasoline and hang our bodies from the lampposts.

#16 Consumed

Consumed

    o0o-Alias ig

  • Members
  • 900 posts

Posted 21 January 2005 - 09:29 PM

i always argue with my english teacher about her disliking clinton because he was with monica but thats rediculous i mean who really gives a damn about what he does in his personal life as long as he is a good president like he was (o ya... thats right bush luvers :unsure: ) ... and i think hilary would be a good president and will in my opinion should win, and it is very likely that she will...
-Alias ingame-

#17 Penguin

Penguin

    cummins powaaah

  • Members
  • 982 posts

Posted 22 January 2005 - 02:56 AM

I hate clinton, but it really has little to do with the sex scandle and the lying under oath. I'm not really in the mood to put together a list atm, but the first thing that always comes to mind is the selling missle technology to china.

#18 Shera

Shera
  • Members
  • 396 posts

Posted 22 January 2005 - 11:38 PM

I agree with Mike for the Republicans that will probably we running in '08 but I really at this point have no clue about who the Democratic party would nominate. All I know is I dont want Mr. "I spent 40 millions dollars on my inaguration" to make any kind of constitutional amendments.
The only reason some people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory. - Paul Fix

#19 Consumed

Consumed

    o0o-Alias ig

  • Members
  • 900 posts

Posted 23 January 2005 - 05:34 AM

im pretty sure its decided that Hillary Clinton and John Edwards are running...
-Alias ingame-

#20 Stotic

Stotic
  • Members
  • 530 posts

Posted 26 January 2005 - 07:00 AM

Edwards is a horrible choice for a running mate. He can't even carry his own state. They'd be better off getting a running mate from a swing state.
We'll douse ourselves in gasoline and hang our bodies from the lampposts.

#21 archmaster

archmaster
  • Members
  • 168 posts

Posted 28 February 2005 - 04:44 PM

Hilary Clinton '08!!!!! Howard Dean and Hilary Clinton would make a really nice team. Cuz bush kills animals, trees, and gays. Bush is a homophobic dumbutt.
You and me, We'll all go down in history, With a sad statue of liberty, and a generation that didn't agree

#22 Penguin

Penguin

    cummins powaaah

  • Members
  • 982 posts

Posted 01 March 2005 - 04:36 AM

Idiot.

/t Stotic: Guilliani is probably their best choice, but that isn't saying much. He isn't that well known outside of NYC and wouldn't stand a chance against Hilary.

#23 Momba

Momba
  • Members
  • 670 posts

Posted 01 March 2005 - 06:49 AM

Idiot.

/t Stotic: Guilliani is probably their best choice, but that isn't saying much. He isn't that well known outside of NYC and wouldn't stand a chance against Hilary.

You'd be surprised. Guilliani a couple years back was payed huge sums of money to restructure Mexico's security forces. The crime rate in cities like La Paz and Qaxaca have been more then cut in half. Other parts of the country are also feeling some positive effects from his work, but haven`t yet seen crime rates cut in half.

The only big obstacle he faces is with members of the Christian right bloc. This because of his continued support of reproductive rights.

I would definatly vote for him with the current condition the US is in. He has proven he is a leader and on the day of 9/11 showed the world how effective he is at dealing with crisis situations.

The only question that lays ahead for him is who's side will he be one. He went from a Democrat, before changing to register as an Independent. Afterward, he finally decided on being a Republican.
My inner child is a mean little f*ucker

#24 Matt

Matt
  • Members
  • 146 posts

Posted 01 March 2005 - 08:10 AM

Hillary is already gearing up for 08' - Have got a lot of e-mails about the Clinton foundation and for friends of hilary or whatnot.

I think Hillary/Bill would be fantastic pick..
"Faith; noun. Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." --- Ambrose Bierce

#25 Lifeless Void

Lifeless Void
  • Members
  • 183 posts

Posted 01 March 2005 - 05:49 PM

Voted other...
World ganna end.
How the hell would I know?

#26 Fyxie

Fyxie
  • Members
  • 35 posts

Posted 01 March 2005 - 06:37 PM

As far as I've heard theres a chance Dean will be running again. I would definately go for Hillary and Powell as Momba mentioned, but it would never happen. Nothing can be that diversified in politics. If Hillary does run though, I will surely be backing her.

Edited by Fyxie, 01 March 2005 - 06:38 PM.

Fyxie - Dissident Chairwoman

#27 Stotic

Stotic
  • Members
  • 530 posts

Posted 15 May 2005 - 02:30 AM

The only question that lays ahead for him is who's side will he be one. He went from a Democrat, before changing to register as an Independent. Afterward, he finally decided on being a Republican.

Well obviously he'd be a republican nominee (assuming this because of his participation in recent republican conventions). He'd be a strong choice because of what you said. He isn't as far right as most other republicans so he's more of a centrist. This surely would help in getting those votes from undecided voters.
We'll douse ourselves in gasoline and hang our bodies from the lampposts.

#28 Lifeless Void

Lifeless Void
  • Members
  • 183 posts

Posted 18 May 2005 - 04:48 PM

BeLiEvE WhAt I SaY, It iS aLl To TrUe>.>.>.
How the hell would I know?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users