Anyone know what the enhance formula is or seems to be? At what levels does the amount of strength enhance boosts increase? Does it enhance more or less based on a stat?
If anyone knows, I appreciate it.
Enhance
Started by Autek, Jan 03 2010 07:28 AM
3 replies to this topic
#2
Guess
-
- Members
- 43 posts
Posted 03 January 2010 - 12:27 PM
Enhance is by level, every x amount of levels yields 1str... I believe.
#3
Autek
-
- Members
- 1967 posts
Posted 03 January 2010 - 06:47 PM
Yeah I've figured that out, level 26, 27, and 28 clerics all enhanced for 5, but a level 33 enhanced for 7. . . The 26, 27 and 28 were tested by someone else, I don't know if it was cast on a characters with consistent strength or not.
I think it works on a decimal basis and rounds, because champs and enhance when cast individually on Autek would add up to 29, yet when cast together he has 30 str.
I think it works on a decimal basis and rounds, because champs and enhance when cast individually on Autek would add up to 29, yet when cast together he has 30 str.
Autek in game.
#4
Cruxis
-
- Members
- 573 posts
Posted 01 February 2010 - 07:32 AM
Clerics enhance has a pretty much +1 to it at certain lvls (29 and 32 are the only ones I'm sure of).
Another dependent stat is the str of the character having enhance casted on it. Not the base str either, current str with mods and spells. This is proven by a champ'd paladin being hanced and it being +2 than a normal hance. Not sure if that works with a non paladin being champed then hanced.**
What is weird about enhance to me, from 1-30, cleric spells are pretty normal and consistent. The level after a hance bonus, adding RF doesn't take away the hance bonus, i.e. at 29, you get the next bonus, and at 30, RF allows the bonus to show with full spells. For the hance bonus at 32, it's the same, +1 for all different str's, but at lvl 33 where RF allows hance to be shown for full..it only does for humans (31 str instead of 30). Lings/dwarves have to wait till the cleric is 34 for RF to allow the bonus. I'd think dwarves would be the first to get any bonus shown if others don't, so it's just weird to me.
It could be the way hance has the castee's str used as a variable, or it could be the way RF and enhance stack. I'm more inclined the latter since casting RF first, then hancing, doesn't yeild more str then enhancing then RFing, since enhancing is somehow dependant on current str. I'd think it would.
Edit:**just re-read topic and noticed Autek's last post, apparently it is the same for non paladin crits, though only +1 hance since champs for non pallies is suck, makes sense x.x
Another dependent stat is the str of the character having enhance casted on it. Not the base str either, current str with mods and spells. This is proven by a champ'd paladin being hanced and it being +2 than a normal hance. Not sure if that works with a non paladin being champed then hanced.**
What is weird about enhance to me, from 1-30, cleric spells are pretty normal and consistent. The level after a hance bonus, adding RF doesn't take away the hance bonus, i.e. at 29, you get the next bonus, and at 30, RF allows the bonus to show with full spells. For the hance bonus at 32, it's the same, +1 for all different str's, but at lvl 33 where RF allows hance to be shown for full..it only does for humans (31 str instead of 30). Lings/dwarves have to wait till the cleric is 34 for RF to allow the bonus. I'd think dwarves would be the first to get any bonus shown if others don't, so it's just weird to me.
It could be the way hance has the castee's str used as a variable, or it could be the way RF and enhance stack. I'm more inclined the latter since casting RF first, then hancing, doesn't yeild more str then enhancing then RFing, since enhancing is somehow dependant on current str. I'd think it would.
Edit:**just re-read topic and noticed Autek's last post, apparently it is the same for non paladin crits, though only +1 hance since champs for non pallies is suck, makes sense x.x
Edited by Cruxis, 01 February 2010 - 07:36 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
