10 replies to this topic

[Tom]

fighter; 10% less armor absorbtions on other people
cleric; fine
mage; fine
berserker; 5% less chance to hit
ranger; loose shields, use steel bracers
druid; fix armor spells so only put 2 on max, clerics a/r replaces gea's blessing
paci; fine
theif; insert new malok drop shield, about 10 armor.
pally; 5 more healing power/5% better chance to hit





flame away.

Edited by Tom, 25 October 2004 - 12:34 AM.

[Crane]

I think Paladins' heal is okay as it is - them missing a lot I'm not so sure on.

Taking away Ranger's shields I have suggested already, mainly due to reasons of role-play and physical restrictions.

[jurian]

just let it be

[Momba]

"My" Class Balancing Reccomendations?

Don't think so. These have all been suggested in class related threads. The classes are fine as they are now.

If you don't like dwarf fighters because you feel you are underpowered make it a zerker.

All things are not created equal.

[Haku]

I think Beserkers are fine because they don't have any armor and they lose health when they beserk or smite

[Squee]

If I totally look past what you post and try to fill in the gaping holes with my own imagination, it begins to approach balance. Class balancing isn't as simple as flipping a coin; you have to take in things that only JLH would (probably) be able to think of.

[Terence]

Bracers for Rangers!

[Despair]

I agree totally on the bracers for rangers thing

[Rappy_Ninja]

I agree with all these cept rangers even with a 5% chance to miss on zerkers rangers still are below zerkers...

rangers are fine as is

rest of the things you said should be like you said

[Gaddy]

If you make rangers wear bracers, why would thieves get better armor?

I would suggest that rangers and thieves both use the same kind of shield, though I think steel bracers are a bit weak for an arch of either class to wear. I think a 10-15ac shield would suffice for both classes.

[sayadin]

just let it be

i'm with jurian on this one.