Spin Attack
#1
Posted 29 March 2004 - 10:56 PM
There are two classes that can multi-attack: the Ranger, and the Berserker.
Their attacks are: Rapid fire, and Berserk. Respectively.
Though my idea may seem short-sighted and ill-concieved, i did put a lot of thought into it.
Spin Attack: a fighter is very well trained and is able to spin around with a weapon and strike multiple targets around themselves.
This attack would deal 1.5 times normal damage and strike at one person per stamina on the square.
The accuracy of a fighter would take a penalty: reduced to 80% of origional for ten seconds per stamina.
The attack would cost all the fighter's stamina.
Tell me your thoughts, but please be gentle.
#2
Posted 30 March 2004 - 12:11 AM
#3
Posted 30 March 2004 - 01:53 AM
less successful but would generally kill everyone not nopk'd.Nice thoughts, but it would be like wrath of gods. Only much less successful. I like the basic concept. However once again, I believe more all out stamina usages are not needed.
im for a spin attack, but if a fighter was spinning and attacking, i doubt he would be hitting for 1.5x damage. more like .5x damage. i think if it was added, would need to hit nopk people sicne you really cant see who your hitting, and only use 1 stamina
ScarletMuse 03/2/2005 11:20am
#4
Posted 30 March 2004 - 02:44 AM
put that 1 counter attack thing or w/e or stances
#5
Posted 30 March 2004 - 02:50 AM
Eesha ingame.
#6
Posted 30 March 2004 - 03:03 AM
ScarletMuse 03/2/2005 11:20am
#7
Posted 30 March 2004 - 03:33 AM
If left at 1.5x dmg, yes. But if it was bumped down to .5x or possibly even caused for a slower stamina regeneration due to all that frightful spinning..who knows. I just don't think it'd be worth all the effort,but I'd not object looking at formulas/other sugestions on how exactly this would work in a non-overpowered-sensible-effective manner.hmm, i guess i misunderstood it. yeah, this would be a weaker version of wrath of gods, i still think its too powerful though
Eesha ingame.
#8
Posted 30 March 2004 - 07:53 PM
puts it down somewhere to 64% accuracy if you use it twice in one minute
Edited by green_mantis, 30 March 2004 - 07:55 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users