Edited by joanna, 08 December 2007 - 07:34 PM.
Changing Old Class Name To New Class Names (cleric - Priest Ect)
#1
Posted 08 December 2007 - 07:34 PM
#2
Posted 08 December 2007 - 07:46 PM
The new titles should apply for levels 31+ instead of 30+.
I also think "Grandmaster" should be applied at level 36+, not level 35+, as that is when the level requirements change.
#3
Posted 08 December 2007 - 07:51 PM
#4
Posted 09 December 2007 - 12:03 AM
#5
Posted 09 December 2007 - 12:41 AM
For Grandmaster... even though level 36 is where the requirements change, I would personally keep it at 35 because upon reaching that level, the Guildmaster has taught you all that he/she knows, so grading you to Grandmaster (much like a martial arts grading) would be the final step. After that, you can only teach yourself and follow your own path (of the Grandmaster guilds I've seen so far, they are devoid of much scenery and have no Guildmaster, but emphasise self-discovery), until you reach perfection in the mastery of yourself and your craft and become fabled and Legendary.
Would the new system be something like this (using a female Cleric as an example):
Level 29 - Master Cleric
Level 30 - Archmaster Cleric
Level 31 - Archmaster Class I Priestess (personally, I think "Archmaster Priestess, Class I" sounds better, but I'm not sure how easy it is to splice the strings like that)
Level 32 - Archmaster Class II Priestess
Level 33 - Archmaster Class III Priestess
Level 34 - Archmaster Class IV Priestess
Under this, the class rank makes the crit's level more obvious (e.g. Class II = 32, the rank being the units digit of the level).
Long story short, I support the advanced class name being put at level 31 or higher.
Edited by Crane, 09 December 2007 - 12:50 AM.
Main crits:
Crane
Europa
Don't kill the
#6
Posted 09 December 2007 - 02:11 AM
Good idea
#7
Posted 09 December 2007 - 03:10 AM
Let's not forget the gold stars that encircle a player's name on the website. Should that be made level 36+ too (assuming Grandmaster is shifted up one level) or keep that at level 35+?
For Grandmaster... even though level 36 is where the requirements change, I would personally keep it at 35 because upon reaching that level, the Guildmaster has taught you all that he/she knows, so grading you to Grandmaster (much like a martial arts grading) would be the final step. After that, you can only teach yourself and follow your own path (of the Grandmaster guilds I've seen so far, they are devoid of much scenery and have no Guildmaster, but emphasise self-discovery), until you reach perfection in the mastery of yourself and your craft and become fabled and Legendary.
Would the new system be something like this (using a female Cleric as an example):
Level 29 - Master Cleric
Level 30 - Archmaster Cleric
Level 31 - Archmaster Class I Priestess (personally, I think "Archmaster Priestess, Class I" sounds better, but I'm not sure how easy it is to splice the strings like that)
Level 32 - Archmaster Class II Priestess
Level 33 - Archmaster Class III Priestess
Level 34 - Archmaster Class IV Priestess
Under this, the class rank makes the crit's level more obvious (e.g. Class II = 32, the rank being the units digit of the level).
Long story short, I support the advanced class name being put at level 31 or higher.
I totaly agree. I get mixed up somtimes seeing Class II thinking its lvl 32 and not 31.. I get tired of looking at a V in Archmaster Class V Sorceror. When level 34... I also think that 35 should still = grandmaster since its the 1st level after 1b exp.
#8
Posted 09 December 2007 - 04:57 AM
-Proverbs 4:7
#9
Posted 09 December 2007 - 02:51 PM
Vegas 1a....formerly known as Memphis ¨¨*:·(^.^)·:*¨¨
#10
Posted 09 December 2007 - 07:42 PM
wait im unclear at the lvl 35 mark.....still grandmaster and stars correct?
Should be.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users