Election Test
#1
Posted 11 November 2004 - 04:48 AM
The dreams in which I'mdying, are the best I've ever had
#2
Posted 11 November 2004 - 02:43 PM
#3
Posted 11 November 2004 - 03:16 PM
Hump in game.
#4
Posted 11 November 2004 - 05:35 PM
it's plausible that the SOB hasn't spawned
¯¨:·»Gently spamming the forum since 2003«·:¨¯
#5
Posted 11 November 2004 - 05:38 PM
ya dumb rednecksWow, the average IQ in Mississippi is 85
#6
Posted 13 November 2004 - 03:22 AM
Complete patterns
Put together a puzzle of a car
Tell the lady what water was made of, and other things like that.
I don't really remember anything having to do with political science or anything. Pretty much, your IQ usually doesn't reflect on your wisdom.
They are very different things.
And I can tell you why Bush won: Three reasons.
1. More people voted for Bush.
2. The right amount of people in a state voted for Bush.
3. The election wasn't close enough for the dems to successfully pull off enough voter fraud in Ohio.
I can also tell you the cause behind these..
1. Kerry switches on issues: He says that he recognizes that a fetus is human, and he STILL VOTED AGAINST THE BAN! Kerry also 'votes for bills before he votes against it'
2. Kerry obviously lies. During the debates, he 'had a plan'. I, still to this day, do not know what his 'plan' was. If he has a plan he should go right ahead and tell us.
3. Kerry wasn't even a good senator. Someone once brought up against me that Bush was on vacation more than other presidents... well, Kerry doesn't even SHOW UP in the senate often.
4. Kerry doesn't have any real values, or at least doesn't show any. Bush does.
5. Bush did a satisfactory job as president.
#7
Posted 13 November 2004 - 03:39 AM
#8
Posted 16 November 2004 - 04:10 AM
lol.So... when I took my IQ test, I had to
Complete patterns
Put together a puzzle of a car
Tell the lady what water was made of, and other things like that.
I don't really remember anything having to do with political science or anything. Pretty much, your IQ usually doesn't reflect on your wisdom.
They are very different things.
And I can tell you why Bush won: Three reasons.
1. More people voted for Bush.
2. The right amount of people in a state voted for Bush.
3. The election wasn't close enough for the dems to successfully pull off enough voter fraud in Ohio.
I can also tell you the cause behind these..
1. Kerry switches on issues: He says that he recognizes that a fetus is human, and he STILL VOTED AGAINST THE BAN! Kerry also 'votes for bills before he votes against it'
2. Kerry obviously lies. During the debates, he 'had a plan'. I, still to this day, do not know what his 'plan' was. If he has a plan he should go right ahead and tell us.
3. Kerry wasn't even a good senator. Someone once brought up against me that Bush was on vacation more than other presidents... well, Kerry doesn't even SHOW UP in the senate often.
4. Kerry doesn't have any real values, or at least doesn't show any. Bush does.
5. Bush did a satisfactory job as president.
Now then, I do not disagree for the most part. However, I think Bush did a hell of a POS job as president. He's got our country in some deep crap with a lot of other countries and our debt blows hardcore.
Kerry sucks, in every single way you stated (though I can't say I've heard much or anything about him as a Senator). He sits on a swing of what he thinks the people will like best that week. He bends his morals and such because he knows that if he says he values something, people will vote for him, then says he won't ban something, the other people will vote for him.
You can call us Americans dumb or whatever the hell you want. The fact is that we were screwed. We did not have a good cantidate for president, and we picked the one that looked the least retarded and had some experience in screwing up.
Anyway, I'm pretty late on the topic and all of this stuff is long gone. I don't like to see the ignorance of some people overseas though. Kerry wasn't better than Bush; he just said Bush sucked and that he could do better, nothing about how.
We needed Colin Powell to run for president, but his family didn't want him to, and quite honestly, some racist hick would've probably killed him.
-Proverbs 4:7
#9
Posted 16 November 2004 - 05:01 AM
Go away.So... when I took my IQ test, I had to
I think that IQ test only justifies my position further ^^
Bush won the election because of moral issues. Next thing you know we're going to have Bush thinking he's the Second Coming of Christ....
I think I've said this before but I attribute the exit polls regarding moral issues as the key to an uneducated public. What do we do if we don't understand or don't really care about what happens in politics? We go after things that we have personal beliefs in. Things that on a large scale wont actually do much for the country.
In regards to Kerry's defiant flip-floppery, I might direct your attention to this site which details Bush's own instances of 'Flip-Floppery' Flip-Flopper-in-Chief
The fact is, Presidents are not infallible. Every single one is a human being. As much as Bush would love to think he is God, he is not. Bush has lied, has gotten facts wrong, and has made promises he can't keep. So has every other president in history. It's not a question of whether or not Kerry flip flops or whatever the Republicans coined it, the important thing is that he cares about the country. I seriously believe that Bush does care about the country, but on a 3rd grade level. He cares about it like a child cares about a christmas ornament. It's shiny and pretty on the outside, but it's fragile enough to break if you aren't careful with it. I think right now the ornament that is the USA is about to slip off the branch after it has been toyed with by the child that is W.
I do read quite a lot of Anti-Bush prose, but I will admit that even I think that writers like Michael Moore are biased. However, they do raise questionable issues. Issues that the administration wont explain and that can't really be concealed under the cover of 'national security based confidentiality'...
Anyways, sleep time. You all know I'm Anti-Bush anyways so have fun with those thoughts....
Edited by Zylia, 16 November 2004 - 05:04 AM.
#10
Posted 16 November 2004 - 07:21 AM
#11
Posted 16 November 2004 - 08:38 AM
30. Winning The War On Terror
Bush claims he can win the war on terror: "One of the interesting things people ask me, now that we're asking questions, is, can you ever win the war on terror? Of course, you can." [President Bush, 4/13/04]
…Bush says war on terror is unwinnable: "I don't think you can win [the war on terror]." [President Bush, 8/30/04]
…Bush says he will win the war on terror: "Make no mistake about it, we are winning and we will win [the war on terror]." [President Bush, 8/31/04]
#12
Posted 16 November 2004 - 01:48 PM
The media often displays specific information (while leaving out parts) to get a certain message across to the public (a message THEY want to display to you) like the news you guys get over there regarding Iraq.
Michael moore is doing the exact same thing, although he is obviously very anti-Bush.
Personally alot of what Moore says, writes about, shoots on film is pretty accurate, but as said before he is simply manipulating a form of media to his advantage.
#13
Posted 16 November 2004 - 02:17 PM
#14
Posted 16 November 2004 - 02:44 PM
#15
Posted 16 November 2004 - 09:01 PM
Please don't tell me that there are so many "limited" people out there that they drop the average IQ by 7 points... =\
#16
Posted 16 November 2004 - 09:32 PM
#17
Posted 16 November 2004 - 09:47 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users