just shut itoh and rappy...mabye you got pwned because you and your team sucks.
Highest Berserk
#31
Posted 16 September 2004 - 12:16 AM
#32
Posted 16 September 2004 - 01:21 AM
#33
Posted 16 September 2004 - 01:23 AM
#34
Posted 16 September 2004 - 11:12 AM
#35
Posted 16 September 2004 - 11:48 PM
#36
Posted 17 September 2004 - 01:31 AM
for my team sucking so badly only 4 people can beat me 3v3 and I dont even have eq and those 4 are the top 3v3ers so I dont feel very bad now do I ? and in terms of alts I own everyone sooh and rappy...mabye you got pwned because you and your team sucks.
#37
Posted 17 September 2004 - 01:55 AM
YOU resorted to flaming me
YOU can't back up what you say
YOU are the one defending some else that had to resort to flaming the individual person
YOU are weaker than me
I'm not a 'newb', but YOU certainly are.
#38
Posted 17 September 2004 - 07:24 PM
#39
Posted 17 September 2004 - 07:58 PM
by other fellow newbs such as yourselfI don't need to back up what I say, because it's been backed many times in other posts
#40
Posted 17 September 2004 - 11:50 PM
wow..... great..... zepplin...... you....'re..... far...... greater...... than..... I........ could...... ever...... hope........ to...... be.........I don't need to back up what I say, because it's been backed many times in other posts...Read them, and there's my backup...As for the other things...Who cares...You're just being dumb...Don't try to provoke me anymore because I'm not even going to talk to you anymore...You're wasting my time.
#41
Posted 18 September 2004 - 02:07 AM
#42
Posted 18 September 2004 - 11:16 AM
Edited by MessiahX, 18 September 2004 - 11:17 AM.
#43
Posted 18 September 2004 - 03:05 PM
if you got out of the nm arena more oftenwell lil rappy....according to you and how "overpowered" zerks are...anyone with 3 arch zerks could beat you 3 v.s 3 or was that you not being able to get a hit in no matter how skilled you were just some bs you made up?
the fight was dev with 2 arch zerkers both with csotw cleric full eq
now if he couldent round me I -WOULD- have won the fight but seeing as clerics who spell zerkers with bot can round arch crits with full eq in 3-4 stam everytime
it doesnt matter much does it ?
also I didnt say not a hit in I said I couldent drink pots because clickers dont allow you to drink pots till their round is over but seeing is 3-4 stam kills you every time they still have 2-3 stamina left and you never live through it aka you dont get a chance to drink a pot
in short I could be the fast and best player in the world but I am going to die because he is useing a over powered class
btw only talk when you have owned 7+ arch 4 stat zerkers like I have
Edited by Rappy_Ninja, 18 September 2004 - 03:07 PM.
#44
Posted 18 September 2004 - 06:11 PM
BTW you were owned in swamps, lol
Julius 1 alt
#45
Posted 18 September 2004 - 07:56 PM
#46
Posted 19 September 2004 - 01:38 AM
yep and he ran before I could get my army of level 25s together so hmmWell Rappy, if you are the fastest, then kill him first. With all of your OMGliness speed you should be able to click all of your crits and take his entire party before he clicks once, no?
BTW you were owned in swamps, lol
also instead of just insulting me blindly maybe did It occur to you that I got bad rounds ?
Edited by Rappy_Ninja, 19 September 2004 - 01:39 AM.
#47
Posted 19 September 2004 - 02:22 PM
No flaming or getting into arguments jus some one who has trained alot of zerks putting in a valid point for the big beasts :/
#48
Posted 19 September 2004 - 07:10 PM
#49
Posted 19 September 2004 - 07:42 PM
/t Rappy as for running you sat for 20 minutes talking trash about how you are 21 and can do whatever you want, while we were still in swamps training. So if it takes you that long to get your army, then i feel bad for you, lag musta been bad huh?
Julius 1 alt
#50
Posted 19 September 2004 - 08:01 PM
Anyways, Rappy, Penguin, you two really have some problems. You hypocritical
nightmist fiends. You are the epitome of the annoying nightmist player that can't live
without the game. You whine about everything that doesn’t suit you best. And frankly, I,
as well as others I am sure, have had enough of it.
What makes you think that anyone cares that you can’t beat berserkers? I can’t beat
100 rangers, but that doesn’t make them overpowered. Berserkers have the worst hit
rate, next to mages, in the game, they get NO armor. That means no, lets try that again
NO, enhanced stats.
So while 2 berserkers with a cleric can round your 3 whatever they ares in a straight
duel, try some strategy. Your awfully hard to hit when invisible right? So bring a mage
next time. And their cleric can’t have much stamina left to heal if he cast all those spells
on his dudes. Take him out, and then go after the berserkers.
So instead of coming on these boards pissing blood on berserkers, why don’t you try to
come up with a strategy that can work on them. That way you can make your ridiculous
claims to supremacy again.
#51
Posted 19 September 2004 - 09:08 PM
#52
Posted 19 September 2004 - 09:31 PM
/t julius I know, but the majority of my crits are arch, so don't get all excited when I get pked 8 on 4 when I'm all torchs
#53
Posted 20 September 2004 - 02:12 AM
Anyways back to the real discussion. In Triplex the other day my first group was 2 arch zerk+cleric vs. paladin thief and ranger. Of course with RF and enhance we owned, and if VersionOne wasn't too busy clicking porn pop-ups it would have been even quicker. But the next round was 3 zerks vs cleric and 2 rangers. expert and 2 arch zerk vs all arch ranger and cleric. guess who won? Not the unspelled solo berserkers. Why? Becuase of a Cleric. The whole point is, it doesnt matter What you are using int he party as long as there is a cleric to cast spells. Divine Light destroys berserkers, then you give those arch rangers RF and Enhance and you can round an arch zerk too, the whole thing is who hits who first. But 3v3 cleric and zerks and cleric and rangers, the rangers will have a key advantage. Stat mods. with the ability to have a 25 dex a halfling ranger is just retarded fast and with RF and Enhance, bye bye anything in the way.
So the point is berserkers arent over powered, rangers arent overpowered, Clerics are the ones giving them their power.as long as you have a cleric, you stand to have a fair fight.
Julius 1 alt
#54
Posted 20 September 2004 - 02:28 AM
#55
Posted 20 September 2004 - 04:16 PM
strange cus when I came you all were gone... hm.../t Penguin neither can anyone else...
/t Rappy as for running you sat for 20 minutes talking trash about how you are 21 and can do whatever you want, while we were still in swamps training. So if it takes you that long to get your army, then i feel bad for you, lag musta been bad huh?
#56
Posted 20 September 2004 - 04:18 PM
nice so while I am invis with a mage he casts rf then he casts vision then clicks 2 of my altsThis topic right here is proof that staff doesn't even bother with these boards.
Anyways, Rappy, Penguin, you two really have some problems. You hypocritical
nightmist fiends. You are the epitome of the annoying nightmist player that can't live
without the game. You whine about everything that doesn’t suit you best. And frankly, I,
as well as others I am sure, have had enough of it.
What makes you think that anyone cares that you can’t beat berserkers? I can’t beat
100 rangers, but that doesn’t make them overpowered. Berserkers have the worst hit
rate, next to mages, in the game, they get NO armor. That means no, lets try that again
NO, enhanced stats.
So while 2 berserkers with a cleric can round your 3 whatever they ares in a straight
duel, try some strategy. Your awfully hard to hit when invisible right? So bring a mage
next time. And their cleric can’t have much stamina left to heal if he cast all those spells
on his dudes. Take him out, and then go after the berserkers.
So instead of coming on these boards pissing blood on berserkers, why don’t you try to
come up with a strategy that can work on them. That way you can make your ridiculous
claims to supremacy again.
if you got out of swamps you would know about pvp but stfu because you dont know nowhere near as much about dueling/3v3s as I do
#57
Posted 20 September 2004 - 04:19 PM
3 zerkers blow in a 3v3 combo its because they could heal and you couldent also you all must have been terribly slow/t Penguin All I was doing was proving a point. and fyi it was only 6, not that it makes a huge difference.
Anyways back to the real discussion. In Triplex the other day my first group was 2 arch zerk+cleric vs. paladin thief and ranger. Of course with RF and enhance we owned, and if VersionOne wasn't too busy clicking porn pop-ups it would have been even quicker. But the next round was 3 zerks vs cleric and 2 rangers. expert and 2 arch zerk vs all arch ranger and cleric. guess who won? Not the unspelled solo berserkers. Why? Becuase of a Cleric. The whole point is, it doesnt matter What you are using int he party as long as there is a cleric to cast spells. Divine Light destroys berserkers, then you give those arch rangers RF and Enhance and you can round an arch zerk too, the whole thing is who hits who first. But 3v3 cleric and zerks and cleric and rangers, the rangers will have a key advantage. Stat mods. with the ability to have a 25 dex a halfling ranger is just retarded fast and with RF and Enhance, bye bye anything in the way.
So the point is berserkers arent over powered, rangers arent overpowered, Clerics are the ones giving them their power.as long as you have a cleric, you stand to have a fair fight.
#58
Posted 20 September 2004 - 10:31 PM
#59
Posted 20 September 2004 - 11:19 PM
Julius 1 alt
#60
Posted 21 September 2004 - 03:34 AM
::remains on the sidelines, grabs his popcorn, and watches the argument, which is very entertaining::
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users