![Photo](http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/6b6b06221cd2d9c667e0d8360b5bd3c6?s=100&d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nightmist-online.co.uk%2Fforum%2Fpublic%2Fstyle_images%2Fmaster%2Fprofile%2Fdefault_large.png)
Inquisitor's Bow
#1
Posted 08 April 2004 - 03:42 AM
Base damage: 23, Can be used by: rangers, Description: This noble bow is made by the purest wood ever known by man. The silver lining across the face of the bow shows the true craftmanship and radiance of this bow. , Level needed to equip it: 30, Magical: Yes, Vamparic: 0 (No), Armor: 0, Strength modifier: 0, Intelligence modifier: 0, Dexterity modifier: 0, Constitution modifier: 0, Wisdom modifier: 0, Charisma modifier: 0, Poison chance: 0, Poison/30s damage: 0, Monster damage table: , Mana leech: .
This majestic bow could either be bought in stores (possibly Harabec) for around 20million gold.
IF this was to be a boss drop the drop rate should be so low that it is hardly not even worth trying to get to. Like .01.
Just a thought.
#2
Posted 08 April 2004 - 04:36 AM
Isnt that a.... TAD harsh?
Copying From many is Research.
It's so exciting I need to poo~Deval
#3
Posted 08 April 2004 - 08:47 AM
#4
Posted 08 April 2004 - 11:02 AM
Mainly because a Ranger can't use a Cobalt effectively, so it is a valid alternative.
#5
Posted 08 April 2004 - 03:18 PM
You would be surprised how many people would buy this.
Now that I think of this maybe add vamp like Poison said due to the price. Around like 0.2-3.
Edited by Oasis, 08 April 2004 - 03:19 PM.
#6
Posted 08 April 2004 - 05:24 PM
Nobody will buy it. I'm sorry to be rude, but who would pay 20 million gold for an extra 2 base damage? Nobody would. The reason people buy cobalt staffs is because it has more base damage than most other weapons, is magical and drains hp. The Inquisitors Bow is, in comparison to the cobalt, useless.Staff didn't think anyone would by a Cobalt. Now look how many there are.
You would be surprised how many people would buy this.
I also don't see how a bow could absorb HP. I can understand a staff because you are touching the staff and when you attack someone, the staff is touching them, thus I can see how the 'life force' would transfer from them to you, but with a bow? Can't see it happening.
#7
Posted 08 April 2004 - 05:59 PM
Skippy the Peanut Butter Fiend.
#8
Posted 08 April 2004 - 11:00 PM
K please do not talk unlesss you know what you are talking about. Rangers cannot do rapid fire with a cobalt, 2base damage and .3 vamp AND magical bow would be worth a ton and I know many people would buy it including me.Nobody will buy it. I'm sorry to be rude, but who would pay 20 million gold for an extra 2 base damage? Nobody would. The reason people buy cobalt staffs is because it has more base damage than most other weapons, is magical and drains hp. The Inquisitors Bow is, in comparison to the cobalt, useless.Staff didn't think anyone would by a Cobalt. Now look how many there are.
You would be surprised how many people would buy this.
I also don't see how a bow could absorb HP. I can understand a staff because you are touching the staff and when you attack someone, the staff is touching them, thus I can see how the 'life force' would transfer from them to you, but with a bow? Can't see it happening.
BTW vamp gives you hp it does not drain it from the object you are hitting.
#9
Posted 09 April 2004 - 12:06 AM
But nightmist isnt built on real world technicalities. I builds its own...
20 million is still a harsh ammount of money for this bow...
Copying From many is Research.
It's so exciting I need to poo~Deval
#10
Posted 09 April 2004 - 05:06 PM
#11
Posted 12 April 2004 - 06:03 PM
#12
Posted 12 April 2004 - 07:08 PM
No, but they can rapid fire with an enchanted bow. 2 base damage would make what... 5 damage difference? Who the hell would pay 20 million for an extra 5 damage?K please do not talk unlesss you know what you are talking about. Rangers cannot do rapid fire with a cobalt, 2base damage and .3 vamp AND magical bow would be worth a ton and I know many people would buy it including me.
BTW vamp gives you hp it does not drain it from the object you are hitting.
You didn't actually suggest giving it a vamp in your original post, which was what I was replying to. You suggested that people spend 20 million gold on a nutsty little weapon with a cool name. Not going to happen.
Actually, now that I look back, you didn't even suggest making it vamparic, someone else did. Next time you try to act all superior, try getting your facts right.
With 2 extra BD and 0.3 vamp people MIGHT buy it, but I still find it highly unlikely.
next you will think the spell blast is unrealistic because it uses magic.
No, next I will be telling you to be quiet because you're annoying me with your blabbering.
Edited by Malavon, 12 April 2004 - 07:19 PM.
#13
Posted 12 April 2004 - 09:03 PM
The main thing i like about this is the name
![:)](http://www.nightmist-online.co.uk/forum/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
it's plausible that the SOB hasn't spawned
¯¨:·»Gently spamming the forum since 2003«·:¨¯
#14
Posted 12 April 2004 - 10:01 PM
-Proverbs 4:7
#15
Posted 13 April 2004 - 02:31 AM
Made a few updates -
Inquisitors Bow;
Base damage: 22, Can be used by: rangers, Description: This noble bow is made by the purest wood ever known by man. The silver lining across the face of the bow shows the true craftmanship and radiance of this bow. , Level needed to equip it: 30, Magical: Yes, Vamparic: .3, Armor: 0, Strength modifier: 0, Intelligence modifier: 0, Dexterity modifier: 0, Constitution modifier: 0, Wisdom modifier: 0, Charisma modifier: 0, Poison chance: 0, Poison/30s damage: 0, Monster damage table: , Mana leech: .
Sold for 10-12m gold in shops.
#16
Posted 13 April 2004 - 12:11 PM
#17
Posted 13 April 2004 - 05:01 PM
ScarletMuse 03/2/2005 11:20am
#18
Posted 13 April 2004 - 06:51 PM
By definition, vampiric means that it saps life from other life forms. A vampiric weapon saps life from the person it is attacking. This is BAD. Post it in the suggestion forum, and see what happens. >_<
edit: Stotic, or some other staff member, will say the exact same thing that we have said. (I say Stotic, because I see more activity from him in the forums than most others. This is no more than an observation, and may just have something to do with the forums that I check. Any or either way...)
Edited by Wolfgang, 13 April 2004 - 06:53 PM.
What the what?
#19
Posted 13 April 2004 - 07:00 PM
That must be why the bows have low base damage at low lvs
(Mantis imagines beating someone over the head with a bow)
#20
Posted 13 April 2004 - 07:07 PM
... If you're using a bow, it is generally implied that you are firing from the bow. Some sort of logic needs to be used if you are going to make these kinds of comments/suggestions. No offence, but you generally areTechnically you dont actually shoot arrows with the bow anyway. The game never says you do unless you use a ranger skill.
That must be why the bows have low base damage at low lvs
(Mantis imagines beating someone over the head with a bow)
What the what?
#21
Posted 14 April 2004 - 06:14 AM
-Proverbs 4:7
#22
Posted 14 April 2004 - 09:26 AM
Not because it isn't logical, but because the game shouldn't and cannot be based on logic all the time, it isn't the way games work.
Games have to have SOME logic in, otherwise they just get stupid.
Edited by Malavon, 14 April 2004 - 09:28 AM.
#23
Posted 14 April 2004 - 08:17 PM
How many times have you shot a bow with a shield in the other hand?
How many times have you shot someone mulitple times without being pentalized?
This list will go on and on.
#24
Posted 14 April 2004 - 09:18 PM
SOME logic!How many times have you been killed then sent to your local pub in town?
How many times have you shot a bow with a shield in the other hand?
How many times have you shot someone mulitple times without being pentalized?
This list will go on and on.
God, some of you people are really thick.
#25
Posted 15 April 2004 - 12:38 AM
Copying From many is Research.
It's so exciting I need to poo~Deval
#26
Posted 15 April 2004 - 12:48 AM
What the what?
#27
Posted 15 April 2004 - 05:03 PM
*nod*Name some nightmist logic.... really... I want to see this, I cant see any when I look.
#28
Posted 16 April 2004 - 04:02 AM
Excuse me, but don't try to flame me you ignorant jackass.Not because it isn't logical, but because the game shouldn't and cannot be based on logic all the time, it isn't the way games work.
Games have to have SOME logic in, otherwise they just get stupid.
It says in the quote you got from me "Cannot and shouldn't be based on logic ALL THE TIME."
Then you say the game needs logic SOMETIMES.
Read whatever the hell you're going to quote maggot.
edit- sorry to be rude, but that really does annoy the hell out of me.
Edited by Gaddy, 16 April 2004 - 04:03 AM.
-Proverbs 4:7
#29
Posted 16 April 2004 - 04:16 AM
#30
Posted 16 April 2004 - 02:40 PM
What the what?
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users